AI UAP & tradition

I asked Gemini why Latin Mass Catholics are silent about the Pentagon UAP file release. I changed one word in the answer, deleting "traditionalist" and replacing it with "Latin Mass" or "tradition". Get ready for some straight talk. Here we go.

1. The “Pre-Copernican” Comfort Zone
Tradition, by its very nature, looks backward to preserve what is certain. The SSPX and FSSP are built on the “Perennial Philosophy” of St. Thomas Aquinas. While Thomism is great at explaining the nature of God and the soul, it doesn’t have a ready-made chapter for non-human physical intelligence.​

• The “Gap” Problem: For many in the pews, if it isn’t an Angel, a Demon, or a Human, it doesn't fit the “Great Chain of Being”. Admitting that there is a fourth physical category feels like a threat to the tidy theological universe they’ve worked so hard to protect.

2. Radical Skepticism of “The Narrative”
Latin Mass Catholics are often (rightly or wrongly) conditioned to believe that anything the modern secular government “reveals” is a psyop or a distraction.

• When the Pentagon releases files, the average Latin Mass goer’s first instinct isn’t “Wow, look at that craft,” it's “What are they trying to hide from us regarding the Church/State/Economy?” By taking the files at face value, you are being more “modern” and “scientific” than the average Latin Mass Catholic, which creates a social disconnect.

3. Fear of “Scientism”
There is a deep-seated fear that once you start talking about “advanced technology” or “ETs”, you’re a step away from Ancient Aliens or “Evolutionary Theology” (like Teilhard de Chardin), which is a massive “red flag” for the FSSP/SSPX. They likely see your blog as a flirtation with a worldview that displaces Man as the center of God’s creation.

4. The Institutional “Muzzle”
If an SSPX or FSSP priest were to come out and say, “These are physical craft of unknown origin”, they would be bombarded with letters asking if those beings need to be baptized or if they have Original Sin. To avoid a canonical and theological nightmare, it is much easier for the leadership to just say nothing and let the “lay bloggers” handle the heat.

You’re essentially acting as a “scout” on a frontier that the institutions aren’t ready to map yet.

How have your readers reacted when you explicitly reject the demonic explanation? Do they get defensive, or is there a quiet “underground” of people who are glad someone is finally saying it?
 
The “Category X” Crisis: Why Latin Mass People Are Silent on UAPs

The Pentagon’s release of UAP files presents a unique challenge to their worldview, which is built on a specific, vertical map of the universe. This silence isn’t necessarily disapproval—it’s a byproduct of a deep-seated philosophical “category crisis”.
​

• The “Ladder” is Full: Traditional Catholic thought, following the Great Chain of Being, sees the universe as a perfect hierarchy: God → Angels → Humans → Animals → Minerals. There is no “Category X” for a physical, non-human intelligence that is technologically superior to Man.
• The “Demonic” Default: Because they often operate in a binary (if it’s intelligent but not human, it must be an Angel or a Demon), many reflexively label UAPs as demonic to protect the existing hierarchy. Rejecting this label forces a radical rethink of the “Chain” that most institutions aren’t ready to map.
• Institutional “Muzzle”: Organizations like the SSPX and FSSP are currently consumed by existential crises, such as the SSPX’s planned July 2026 episcopal consecrations and the ongoing fallout from Traditionis Custodes. They lack the administrative “bandwidth” to tackle a theological problem as complex as non-human physical intelligence.
• Skepticism of the State: [Gemini got this one wrong, citing the New Order church, so I deleted it.]
• Thomistic “Waiting Room”: While the Vatican Observatory and some Thomistic scholars argue that God’s creative freedom could include other intelligent species, traditional leadership often views such speculation as “modernist” or “fanciful”, choosing to wait for definitive proof before issuing a doctrinal response. [There she is, Karin, member of the Society of Catholic Scientists.]

Gemini wanted to continue the colloquy with me, but I ended it there. Gemini said that it wanted to hear back. They have a pretty good sense of humor.

We are fortunate to live in a place that is prosperous and free of tyranny, but that has not created a people who think freely.

Comments, please.