I was rereading the Wikipedia entry for the Catholic Church. On several occasions I have defended the company, and I wanted to test my defense. In the process I found a painting I wanted to better understand. It is in the section titled, “Sexual morality.” Here is a partial quotation from that section: The Catholic Church calls all members to practice chastity according to their state in life. Chastity includes temperance, self-mastery, personal and cultural growth, and divine grace. It requires refraining from lust, masturbation, fornication, pornography, prostitution, and rape. [My reaction to the last word was surprise because it seemed so obvious as to not have required a mention.] Chastity for those who are not married requires living in continence, abstaining from sexual activity; those who are married are called to conjugal chastity. [Footnote 425] Footnote 425 Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2332. Sexuality affects all aspects of the human person in the unity of his body and soul. It especially concerns affectivity, the capacity to love and to procreate, and in a more general way the aptitude for forming bonds of communion with others. Next to the Wikipedia section is a painting by Hans Memling, Allegory with a Virgin. This is the painting I wanted to better understand. The analysis of the painting is copied from Web Gallery of Art, online since 1996 and created by Emil Krén and Daniel Marx. I thought it was so good that I have reproduced it in its entirety. “This rather enigmatic painting has been studied in depth recently, enabling us to venture a more solidly based judgment regarding both its authenticity and the significance of the representation. It should be noted at the outset that the topmost part of the landscape has been entirely overpainted and can thus form no part of the interpretation. The rock with the virgin and the lions is, however, still in a fairly good, original condition. “A young woman is shown standing in a giant piece of amethyst. She is wearing a violet-brown Burgundian dress, and her hands are crossed level with her lap on a point of the crystal. This characteristically chaste pose is further emphasized by her downward gaze. Two lions, with golden shields attached to their bodies, stand threateningly on either side of a small stream that springs from the rocks and carries gemstones and coral in its current. “Because of its colour, amethyst is associated with the violet, the emblem of humility and virginity. The lions are clearly intended as guards, and so their shields are military rather than heraldic in function. The spring represents the Water of Life, and the gemstones are a reference to Paradise. The image can thus be interpreted as an allegory of the strength of Virginity or Purity, which leads to eternal life. The city in the left distance is influenced to a large extent by the Brussels St Sebastian. This may be attributed almost certainly to the restorer.” https://www.wga.hu/html_m/m/memling/2middle3/15allego.html Artist: Hans Memling (circa 1433 –1494), oil on oak wood
Museum: Musée Jacquemart-André collection Photographer: Web Gallery of Art Public domain. This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.
4 Comments
sam
2/19/2023 08:52:24 am
"those who are married are called to conjugal chastity." I would say that this was the teaching of the church pre V2 but not today. Today, for the married, it is taught that everything goes, taught in catholic books and in the confessional based on my 30+ years in the married state. I believe in conjugal chastity in the married state because I learned it from the writings of the preV2 saints, never heard of it anywhere else until I read your Wikipedia citation. This idea of conjugal chastity is connected to the the frequent reception or lack thereof, of the eucharist by the laity, based on my research. and it is also connected to the eastern practice of married priests being chaste for 3 days prior to Sunday. Think about that one the next time you see an entire congregation get up to receive the eucharist. (look, I "don't care" what others do but that doesn't mean I don't reflect on what I see and try to understand what is going on)
Reply
2/19/2023 11:32:11 am
Sam has spoken to me about frequent reception of the Eucharist, something encouraged by Pius X. Read this entry: https://aleteia.org/2022/08/21/why-st-pius-x-is-called-the-pope-of-the-eucharist/
Reply
sam
2/26/2023 10:23:03 am
Pius X is not THE voice that speaks to us to receive frequently, he is one of the many voices of the Fathers, like St. Augustine, and the saints throughout history that want "us" to receive frequently. but they aren't talking about everyone, (based on Father Ferrer) they are talking about religious who are not receiving when they should be because the constitution of the community is to receive once per month at the most. Yes, be holy, be prepared, strive to conquer sin every day like a true Catholic, do the most, not the minimum, be properly disposed, do not let any passion control your heart, get control of your passions, offer up a pure heart for God, do not receive to your condemnation, and when you do that, receive frequently. But where are you starting from? At 50 years old, never have lifted weights, you don't start by pressing your max. For the average public school middle age man, with a life of promiscuity, dirty jokes, Friday the 13th movies, anger, cheating, stealing, lying, etc. maybe one should start with a good dose of penance and confession for many years before receiving frequently and then maybe like once per month. And if you receive frequently and you are still attached to sin, reflect that maybe you are doing something wrong (check Sacra Tridentina on the impossibility of being attached to sin if you receive frequently). That something wrong might be receiving to your condemnation. I do not know the state of anyone's soul nor anyone's capacity to handle risk. I know I don't want to risk being wrong on this so I think I am leaning to the safe side. Maybe one day I will understand all this better, until then, I refrain.
Reply
2/26/2023 10:56:39 am
Sam: the information and reflection are really helpful to me and other readers. Thank you. Bob Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Archives
October 2024
|