Supreme Court of the United States
WEST VIRGINIA ET AL. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.
Decided June 30, 2022
“Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible “solution to the crisis of the day.” New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 187 (1992). But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d). A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body.”
supremecourt.gov/opinions
The hammer strikes a blow to one aspect of modernism: environmental extremism, favorite of the globalists. Mind you, one will not find a person who loves the Sierras more than I, but abiding extremism is contrary to commerce.
Go green - recycle government.
WEST VIRGINIA ET AL. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.
Decided June 30, 2022
“Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible “solution to the crisis of the day.” New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 187 (1992). But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d). A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body.”
supremecourt.gov/opinions
The hammer strikes a blow to one aspect of modernism: environmental extremism, favorite of the globalists. Mind you, one will not find a person who loves the Sierras more than I, but abiding extremism is contrary to commerce.
Go green - recycle government.
RSS Feed