“According to Fox News, the group of fishermen petitioned the Supreme Court over a situation in which the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a federal agency, attempted to force them to pay $700 per day to a contractor that monitors their fishing vessel for ‘compliance.’”
…
The case is called Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, and it will be heard when the Supreme Court enters its next session in the fall of 2023.
…
https://americandigest.com/regulatory-related-lawsuit-to-be-heard-by-supreme-court-could-drastically-alter-fed-practices/?
That could amount to $255,500 per year if they fish every day, the equivalent of confiscating their boat.
Confiscatory used in a sentence [Cambridge Dictionary]: “They have a long list of beefs … confiscatory taxation, rampant spending, and hyper-regulation by the nanny state.”
…
The case is called Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, and it will be heard when the Supreme Court enters its next session in the fall of 2023.
…
https://americandigest.com/regulatory-related-lawsuit-to-be-heard-by-supreme-court-could-drastically-alter-fed-practices/?
That could amount to $255,500 per year if they fish every day, the equivalent of confiscating their boat.
Confiscatory used in a sentence [Cambridge Dictionary]: “They have a long list of beefs … confiscatory taxation, rampant spending, and hyper-regulation by the nanny state.”
RSS Feed